Where did 65 million ya. come from. Modern humans weren't around until between 35,000 - 100,000 y.a.. Australopithecines only date back roughly 5-7 million y.a.. The America's were only populated by humans between 14,000 - 20,000 y.a. (based on current sound archaeological evidence).I would finally re-emphasize a need to focus on chronology. To make a strong argument, that will cause academics as well as others to pause and listen, you need to get the chronology nailed down correctly, otherwise you are just grabbing bits from the air.
Answer: Our televisions, newspapers, magazines and scholarly journals tell us about a great meteorite that fell on the Yucatán in México 65 million years ago. This meteorite was so large that it altered the Mexican landscape and created a great hole to the east which we now call the Gulf of México. The Windward Islands are part of the outer rim of that meteorite crater, or at least that is what they tell us.
One the other hand, the same televisions, newspapers, magazines and journals tell us that man oldest known tools are only 2.5 million years old. In simple mathematics, that means that the meteorite fell some 62.5 million years before humanoids were recognized as earth creatures. What is wrong with this scenario?
Nothing is wrong with this situation except where the dates belong. The most important factor is that many records exist around the world about fire from the skies. This would indicate that human beings, not only saw the event, but were also intelligent enough to record it. True, their records are now twisted into strange mythologies or traditions which the origin is forgotten, but the fact is, there is still enough substance to monuments, mythologies and sometimes, traditions, so that an event as drastic and catastrophic as heavenly fires can still be determined as probable fact.
The Geological Survey of Canada, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Nova Scotia, discovered a similar meteorite in 1987 at 42°53'N, 64°13'W and dated it with K-Ar at 49.9 and 55.8 Ma, placing it roughly between the Eocene and Jurassic Epochs. Here the it is assumed that man entered the scene previous to the event in the beginning of the Cenozoic Epoch.
The formula I have for K-Argon dating is:
t - T (super 1.505)*log(No/N)/0.301 = years left
Potassium (super 40a)
1.3 x 10 (super 9) Argon 40 (12%) while Carbon 14's formula is stated as follows:
Carbon 14 5.72 x 10 (super 3) Nitrogen (super 14)
Is the technical data erroneous? I doubt it. Even if the machinery is off by 12 million years, they would still be within range of pre-human existence. Was the mythology made up from a memory bank of 62.5 million years? Very unlikely. Could traditions have been remembered for 62.5 million years? Again, very unlikely. Then, what is the answer?
The answer should be simple. It should not be a complex problem at all. Stated as follows it should be very easy to understand:
- The meteorite fragment of another star or world was 65 million years in the heavens before it exploded.
- The fragments of this star or world traveled through the heavens as a great comet until it reached the earth's atmosphere.
- When it fragments hit the earth, they were so hot that it melted earth stones with star age components.
- Star age components are what K-Argon dated and what Carbon-14 has dated.
- Because the details of this star fragment fall-out are clearly stated in myths, on monuments, and within tradition, human beings, with the intelligence to record such an event were available and cognizant of the event.
- The monuments, with their dates, and the myths with their verification of such monuments probably have the correct dates for the event.
- K-Argon and Carbon-14 also have the correct dates, but for the star elements that burned their way into our atmosphere.
Conclusion: Both technical estimates and monumental dating, both created by
man's intelligence are giving basic information about the same events.
